20111031-History in pictures blog.jpg
During the Cultural Revolution, the film industry was severely restricted. Most previous films were banned, and only a few new ones were produced. In the years immediately following the Cultural Revolution, the film industry again flourished as a medium of popular entertainment. Domestically produced films played to large audiences, and tickets for foreign film festivals sold quickly.

Chris Berry, a professor of film and television studies at Goldsmiths University of London who organized a Cultural Revolution film series, told dGenerate films, some of the most interesting Cultural Revolution films capture a “the visceral thrill of political action, including violence, and how powerfully exciting this can be for young people, at the same time as it can make them vulnerable to being used and making mistakes. That’s why we chose Mao’s saying “A Single Spark Can Start a Prairie Fire” for the film series. We felt it captured the sense of excitement and danger perfectly.

In the area of culture specifically, Paul Clark’s book, The Chinese Cultural Revolution: A History, has helped to explode all kinds of myths about the Cultural Revolution. Those include the idea that there were only 8 Model Works (yangbanxi) “there were more. And the idea that the films of those 8 Model Works were only movies that the 800 million Chinese had access to was wrong, too. There were older films that continued to circulate, numerous documentaries, new feature films after 1972, and a range of foreign films from countries like Romania, Albania, and North Korea. So, I already wanted to take another look by the time the idea for the series came up.

Film was easy to control, compared say with poetry or even art. We know that people wrote underground novels and poems, copied them, and circulated them by hand. We know that some artists made watercolors on thin tissue paper, rolled them up, and hid them in a secret compartment of furniture. We even know that the Party had trouble establishing standardized and unchanging versions of the model works, and that was one of the reasons they wanted to film them “once their were filmed and the authorized version was clear to everyone, local troupes couldn’t make local changes! But there was no video, and not even any home movie cameras in China then, let alone the internet.

I suppose the closest thing to what you’re asking about was so called “internal” (neibu) screenings of banned works and foreign works that were not released to the general public. In theory, these were to inform trusted central figures of what to be on guard against. But tickets to internal screenings were highly sought after, and not always for those reasons! I believe that Madame Mao (Jiang Qing) was a huge fan of The Sound of Music.

Good Websites and Sources on the Cultural Revolution Virtual Museum of the Cultural Revolution ; Wikipedia article Wikipedia ; Morning Sun ; Red Guards and Cannibals New York Times ; The South China Morning Post has produced a wonderful multimedia report on the Cultural Revolution. Posters: Cultural Revolution posters at The Ohio State University online exhibition Picturing Power: Posters of the Cultural Revolution and the University of Westminster Chinese Poster Collection; Great Leap Forward: University of Chicago Chronicle ; Wikipedia Wikipedia ; Industrial Planning Video You Tube

Death Under Mao: Uncounted Millions, Washington Post article ; Death Tolls People’s Republic of China : Timeline ; ; Wikipedia article Wikipedia ; Cold War International Project ; China Essay Series ; Everyday Life in Maoist; Wikipedia article on propaganda Wikipedia ; Cultural Revolution; Communist China Posters Landsberger Posters ; More Posters ; Yet more posters Ann Tompkins and Lincoln Cushing Collection ; Mao Zedong Wikipedia article Wikipedia ; Chinese ; Mao Internet Library ; Paul Noll Mao site ; Mao Quotations; ; Propaganda Paintings of Mao ; New York Times; Communist Party History Wikipedia article Wikipedia ; Illustrated History of Communist Party

Books About the Cultural Revolution

“The World Turned Upside Down: a History of the Chinese Cultural Revolution” by Yang Jisheng, Translated and Edited by Stacy Mosher and Guo Jian Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2020; "The Cultural Revolution: A People's History” by Frank Dikotter (Bloomsbury 2016); “The Cowshed: Memories of the Chinese Cultural Revolution” by Ji Xianlin (New York Review Books, 2016); "Wild Swans” by Jung Chang, an international bestseller; “Ten Years of Madness: Oral Histories of the Cultural Revolution” and “One Hundred People's Ten Years” by Feng Jicai. “The Execution of Mayor Yin and Other Stories from the Great Cultural Revolution” by Chen Jo-his; Life and “Death in Shanghai” by Nien Chang; “Enemies of the People” by Anne F. Thurston.“Colors of the Mountain” by Da Chen (Random House, 2000) is a coming-of-age set in the Cultural Revolution. It was described by Newsweek as "surprisingly free of cynicism or bitterness...all the more poignant by the wonder and vulnerability in the voice of their child narrator."

“The Lily Theater: A Novel of Modern China” by Lulu Wang is an entertaining and interesting depiction of the Cultural Revolution originally written in Dutch by a Chinese woman with a strong, eccentric voice. The human costs of the Cultural Revolution have been best captured by Simon Leys (the pen-name of the Belgian sinologist and literary critic Pierre Ryckmans) in his books "Chinese Shadows" (1974) and "The Burning Forest" (1987). "Voice from the Whirlwind" by Feng Jicai is a collection of oral histories from the Cultural Revolution. Also worth a look is "My Name is Number 4: A True Story of the Cultural revolution" by Ting-Xing Ye (Thomas Dunne, 2008). Li Zhensheng’s photographs of the Cultural Revolution can be found in “Red Color News Soldier: A Chinese Photographer’s Odyssey Through the Cultural Revolution,” edited by Robert Pledge and published by Phaidon Press in 2016. "Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62" by Frank Dikotter (Walker & Co, 2010)is an excellent book. "Tombstone" by Yang Jisheng, a Xinhua reporter and Communist party member, is the first proper history of the Great Leap Forward and the famine of 1959 and 1961.

“Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62" (Walker & Co, 2010) by Frank Dikotter is an excellent book. “Tombstone” by Yang Jisheng, a Xinhua reporter and Communist party member, is the first proper history of the Great Leap Forward and the famine of 1959 and 1961. “Life and Death Are Wearing me Out” by Mo Yan (Arcade,2008) is narrated by a series of animals that witnessed the Land Reform Movement and Great Leap Forward. The Tragedy of Liberation: A History of the Chinese Revolution, 1945-1957" by Frank Dikotter described the Anti-Rightist period. “China Witness, Voices from a Silent Generation” by Xinran (Pantheon Books, 2009) is collection of oral histories from Chinese who survived the Mao period.

“Mao; the Untold Story” by Jung Chang and Jon Halliday (Knopf. 2005). Jung Chang, author of “Wild Swans”, and her husband John Halliday, a British historian, portrays Mao as villain on the level of Hitler and Stalin. The book was read by U.S. President George Bush and embraced by the American right as a condemnation of Communism. It characterizes Mao as cruel, materialistic, self-centered and a leader who used terror with the aim of ruling the world. There is also a Mao biography by Jonathon Spence. Also check out: “Mao's New World: Political Culture in the Early People's Republic” by Chang-tai Hung (Cornell University Press, 2011); “The Private Life of Chairman Mao” by Dr. Li Zhisui (1994) and “The Penguin History of Modern China” by Jonathan Fenby.

According to the New York Times: "Thousands of Cultural Revolution documents that lay silent for decades, deemed state secrets by a government hardly eager to highlight Mao’s excesses, were made public when the archives of selected declassified government files from that era were opened in Beijing, Shanghai and Xian in 2009. The files, some nearly transparent and thin as one-ply tissue paper, include handwritten drafts of speeches, lists of production quotas, song lyrics, government regulations and minutes of groups that studied Mao’s words. The texts embrace the political rhetoric of the day, in which all problems were succinctly rendered into rhyming epithets. The files apparently have been filtered for anything dealing with deaths and imprisonment, and they describe a country still fervently Communist, and unrecognizable today." [Source: Xiyun Yang and Michael Wines, New York Times, January 25, 2010]

Books Marking The 50th Anniversary of the Cultural Revolution

In 2016, the 50th anniversary of the start of the Cultural Revolution, a number of books on the event were published: “The Red Guard Generation and Political Activism in China” by Guobin Yang (Columbia University Press, 2016); “The Cultural Revolution: A People’s History, 1962–1976" by Frank Dikötter (Bloomsbury, 2016); “Maoism at the Grassroots: Everyday Life in China’s Era of High Socialism edited by Jeremy Brown and Matthew D. Johnson (Harvard University Press, 2016); ““Bianyuanren” Jishi [A Record of “Marginal People”] by Yang Kuisong (Guangzhou: Southern Publishing Media, 2016); “The Cultural Revolution at the Margins: Chinese Socialism in Crisis by Wu Yiching (Harvard University Press).

Other good sources include: “Secret Archives of the Cultural Revolution in Guangxi” edited by Yongyi Song et al (Mirror Media Group, thirty-six-volume e-book, 2016). “Historical Dictionary of the Chinese Cultural Revolution” by Guo Jian, Yongyi Song, and Yuan Zhou (Rowman and Littlefield); “The Chinese Cultural Revolution Database” edited by Yongyi Song and others (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, third edition, CD – ROM);

Ian Johnson wrote in the New York Review of Books: For a clear and strongly written acount of the Cultural Revolution in a broad perspective we now have Frank Dikötter’s new book, The Cultural Revolution: A People’s History, 1962–1976. There are some issues on his interpretations of facts. His version of events differs little from other histories of the Cultural Revolution, such as the more definitive and evenhanded—albeit weightier and less readable—Mao’s Last Revolution (2006) by Roderick MacFarquhar and Michael Schoenhals. [Source: Ian Johnson, New York Review of Books, October 27, 2016]

“Of all the books on the Cultural Revolution that have appeared during this anniversary year, I was most intrigued by those that told detailed local stories to illustrate the larger history. This drew me to “Maoism at the Grassroots: Everyday Life in China’s Era of High Socialism”, a volume edited by Jeremy Brown of Simon Fraser University in British Columbia and Matthew D. Johnson of Grinnell College. In their introduction, Brown and Johnson make it clear that they want to broaden our understanding of the Cultural Revolution and the period that preceded it: “The author of that article is the Shanghai historian Yang Kuisong, who also published this year his own book on grassroots China, A Record of “Marginal People,” a fine series of eight profiles drawn from papers and files that he found in antique markets and archives, and through his personal connections. Unfortunately this book has not been translated into English, but the stories give fascinating insights into the tumult faced by ordinary people during the Mao period, especially the Cultural Revolution.

“Historical Dictionary of the Chinese Cultural Revolution” by Guo Jian, Yongyi Song, and Yuan Zhou (Rowman and Littlefield); “The Chinese Cultural Revolution Database” edited by Yongyi Song and others (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, third edition, CD – ROM); “The Cultural Revolution at the Margins: Chinese Socialism in Crisis by Wu Yiching (Harvard University Press).

Cultural Revolution Literature

Man He of Williams College wrote: Liu Binyan’s “Between Man and Monster” (1979) is “a celebrated work of reportage that exposed corruption at a state-run coal-mining enterprise in Heilongjiang.” It “identifies misrule by monsters, not criminals, as the problem behind the Cultural Revolution. Wang Shouxin, the female official condemned in the work, is...emblematic of the “monsters” that ruled during the Cultural Revolution, [Source: Man He, Williams College, MCLC Resource Center Publication, July, 2017]

“Dai Houying’s novel “Humanity, Ah Humanity!” (1980) is a literary testimony that “contested the conception of a rational, impersonal, and objectively existing force of justice”. He work has multiple narrators and prioritizes “psychological interiority over plot and emotions over hard facts. By reviving the genre of psychological realism, Dai probed her characters’ interiority, or more precisely their individual and emotional reactions to everyday alienation. Readers during the post-Mao transition were shown that “a truly just reckoning with the past must take full account of the complexity and individuality of human emotions”. The actualization of transitional justice did not merely rely on a story of requital; it was also rooted in the equation of “human circumstances” with “emotions”.

“Yang Jiang’s 1981 memoir, “Six Records of a Cadre School” was a widely-read work and the “the first Cultural Revolution memoir by an established author.” It focuses on routine events that took place at a May Seventh Cadre School, a rural labor camp for sent-down urban intellectuals. Yang’s multiple, fragmented, and incomplete accounts reflect the complexities of the post-Mao transition.” Yang explores the :shame that exists among all who experienced the Cultural Revolution. She was assigned the job of guarding the collected feces of the cadre school from being stolen by local peasants.

Roots and Style of Cultural Revolution Film

Chris Berry, a professor of film and television studies at Goldsmiths University of London, told dGenerate films, “The style of the model works, including the style of the films made out of them, is very overwhelming. But it is also very distinctive. For people outside China at the time, the films and posters were the first contact they had with the Cultural Revolution, and they seem to have left an indelible image of China in the rest of the world, as well as a very powerful image of the Cultural Revolution itself in China. But at the same time we must acknowledge that the Cultural Revolution style has to be seen as part of a long history of efforts to invent a specifically Chinese modern style since the May Fourth Movement early in the twentieth century, if not earlier. What made the Cultural Revolution style different was how successful it was and how powerfully it took hold. Even if people got bored with the limited range of works available or their politics, the style continues to get people’s attention!” [Source: Michael Chenkin, CinemaTalk: dGenerate Films]

You can get some sense of its power when you watch something like the ballet version of The Red Detachment of Women. Forget delicate swans fluttering tragically to the floor. This is girls with guns and grenades, but still en pointe. The militant requirements of the revolutionary aesthetic led to a complete reworking of traditional ballet. The romantic couple is irrelevant and the pas de deux more or less disappears. In its place comes a range of breathtaking leaps and aggressive thrusts, all coordinated by the corps de ballet. Seeing the main character poised above the cowering landlord, her bayonet held over him, is such a contrast to anything you’ll find in traditional ballet! It makes the hairs on the back of your neck stand up “for all kinds of reasons. And the whole work is amazingly kinetic and energetic.

As well as ballet, the people who designed and developed the model works also borrowed Western symphonic music, and mixed it with elements of Chinese opera music. Adding Chinese instruments and other elements “sinicized” symphonic music, but it also enabled an integration of the individual works, so that they were no longer as fragmented and episodic as traditional operas. And, as with the ballets, the contents changed, too: the old scholars and generals and fair maidens were replaced with worker, peasant, soldier heroes and class struggle themes.

As regards the links with Russia, of course ballet came from there. It might seem very strange to people in the West that China took ballet, because we think of it as a court art, and very much the opposite of revolutionary art. But the Russians hung on to it as a national form, I believe. And for China in the 1950s, it was OK because it came from the Soviet Union. I think it spoke to the desire to be modern, as was also the case with symphonic music. This is something else we forget about the Cultural Revolution. The drive for rapid material change, scientific modernity, and so forth that we see in China today is in fact a continuity from both before and during the Cultural Revolution. That has been a consistent, indeed desperate, goal from the 1920s on, and it has been associated with Europe and North America throughout. Just how to get there has changed!

But although these art forms were taken in via the Soviet Union, the Sino-Soviet split had well and truly taken hold well before the Cultural Revolution. China stayed loyal to Stalin’s memory despite Khrushchev’s criticisms of him. So, they had adopted socialist realism in the 1950s, but after the split and the need to develop their own path in everything, the Chinese communist line on the arts was “a combination of socialist realism and revolutionary romanticism”. Of course, it’s precisely that idea of romanticism that licensed the highly unrealist style of the Cultural Revolution model works.

Power, Struggle and Violence in Cultural Revolution Film

On power represented in Cultural Revolution films, Berry said: “For me, something that gave me a jolt when watching the model works again was the strong and positive emphasis on class hatred. All that energy was very exciting, but I was brought up short every time the films hammered home the need to mobilize class hatred. I couldn’t help wondering about what it was like to be on the receiving end of that hatred. I wonder whether anyone had similar worries at the time, or is my thinking that way more the result of all the post-Cultural Revolution films that present it from the perspective of the victims of class struggle?

As you might expect with a movement that placed such emphasis on identifying and eliminating the enemy as a way of unifying “the masses” with their leaders, the Cultural Revolution is very starkly polarized. Characters are either good or bad. The aesthetic theory of the “Three Prominences” (san tuchu) articulated this: among the characters, the positives ones should be prominent; among the positive ones, the heroes; and among the heroes, the main hero should be most prominent. Bad guys were lit poorly, decentered in the frame, skulking, and looked down on, whereas heroes were bright, shining, in the centre, and shot from below, often gazing into the middle distance. In the documentaries from the time, Chairman Mao gets the close-ups!

However, one thing that has to be said about that is I don’t think it always worked. In theory, the most positive character is supposed to be the most interesting, but I don’t think that someone who is so uniformly knowledgeable and good draws our attention. In The Red Detachment of Women, for example, it’s the male detachment leader who is the main hero. But I can’t even remember his name right now. The one who everyone loves is Qionghua, the former slave girl who has to learn to submit to revolutionary discipline rather than pursue personal revenge. I’m sure if you asked most people who the main character was, they’d say her.

Films Made During the Cultural Revolution

During the Cultural Revolution, great emphasis was put not only on class struggle but also on technological progress and national self-reliance. The model 'commune' of Dazhai and the industrial model at Daqing were promoted in documentaries. These themselves were shown all over the country by mobile projection teams on a special super-8 style 8.75mm film stock developed for the purpose. Mr. Liu plans to bring his 8.75mm projector to Vienna to show us, along with some documentaries. The newsreels of the time present a powerful and vibrant record of the political culture of the time, with its mass rallies, criticism sessions, and parades. Mr. Liu will present and discuss some of these materials.

“Dongfang Hong” (“The East Is Red”) by Wang Ping, China (1965): Released immediately before the Cultural Revolution, this song and dance epic soon became one of its iconic works, and the title song became its anthem. One of the main elements of the Cultural Revolution was the Chairman Mao. People carried the Little Red Book with them everywhere, and reported on their day to pictures of Mao on the wall when they came home in the evening. Mao was the red, red sun, and his followers were the sunflowers that turned towards him. This reverent work follows the history of the Revolution from the founding of the Communist Party of China in 1921 through to the 1949 Liberation, in glowing Chinese.

“Hongse Niangzijun” (“The Red Detachment of Women”) by Pan Wenzhang, Fu Jie (1970) is a film of the revolutionary ballet based on the popular 1961 film by the same name. Forget about frail women in tutus fluttering to their tragic and beautiful deaths. Red Detachment of Women is still en pointe. But otherwise it is all clenched fists, righteous anger, and bayonets at the ready! Freed by the Communists from imprisonment by the local landlord, Wu Qionghua seeks vengeance. In this story of women’s liberation and empowerment, Mao-style, she also learns about revolutionary discipline. The film provides some of the most powerful iconography to come out of the Cultural Revolution. In their uniforms with short pants, the ballerinas were also the pin-up girls of the Mao era.

“Zhiqu Weihushan” (“Taking Tiger Mountain by Strategy”) by Xie Tieli (1970): Before it was the title of Brian Eno’s second album, released in 1974, Taking Tiger Mountain by Strategy was one of the most popular revolutionary operas. Like many other young Westerners, Eno was inspired by the idea of the Cultural Revolution. He picked the name after seeing a book of postcards showing key scenes from the film. The story is based on a true event from 1946, when a Communist reconnaissance team member disguised himself as a bandit in order to infiltrate their stronghold. Full of bold leaps and martial arts-style action, the film is a thrilling and kinetic action movie as well as a propaganda film.

“Breaking with Old Ideas” (Li Wenhua, 1976) was made at the end of the Cultural Revolution. The filmmakers made an effort to avoid depicting the character of individuals, Instead they focused on showing a collective personality. The title of the film refers to the idea prevalent at the time that in schools around China put too much emphasis study and did not leave enough time for social practice. Rebecca Davis of Variety wrote: Highly recommended! I watched it recently and was frankly riveted by it. Super engaging — very interesting depiction of debates of the time around science and education, and a great visual for what… propaganda looked like.”

“Kunao Ren De Xiao” (“Troubled Laughter”) by Deng Yimin, Yang Yanjin (1979) was made after the Cultural Revolution. Immediately after the Cultural Revolution in 1976, a cycle of ‘scar films’ helped the Chinese public come to terms with the “decade of chaos.” Most were high melodrama. But, full of dream sequences and luridly coloured fantasies, Troubled Laughter is a rare absurdist comedy. In 1975, reporter Fu Bin returns to work after political re-education. But he finds himself caught between the desire to write the truth and the deluded politics of the final days of the Cultural Revolution. Even his wife advises him to lie, but in the end he is arrested again. A final coda promises release and family reunion. But it is shot as a fantasy sequence, suggesting it may not be for real. Troubled Laughter was selected for screening outside competition at Cannes in 1981.

Documentaries About the Cultural Revolution

“Morning Sun” is directed by Carma Hinton, Geremie R. Barmé, and Richard Gordon, who also made “The Gate of Heavenly Peace” about the Tiananmen Square. Combining rarely-seen footage from newsreels, propaganda films, and old documentaries, as well as first-person accounts by former Red Guards and their victims, “Morning Sun” creates an insightful chronicle of traumatic events during the Cultural Revolution. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer described it as “Compelling and illuminating.” Sight and Sound called it “A huge contribution to our understanding of what was going on in the minds of those teenage Red Guards.” [Source: Asian Society]

Carma Hinton was born in Beijing in 1949, the same year as founding of the People’s Republic of China. The child of dedicated American revolutionaries, today she works in the United States as a documentary filmmaker. Morning Sun takes her back to Beijing to interview her friends about their time as Red Guards. Combined with rare archival footage, it conjures up the excitement and psychology of the times. Where Auch wenn ich nicht mehr bin focuses on the victims, Morning Sun examines the perpetrators — or were they victims, too?

“Yang Ban Xi” (“The Eight Model Works,” 2005) is a directed by Yan Ting Yuen. Yang Ban Xi were propaganda model plays created under the leadership of Mao's wife Jiang Qing. Stunning Beijing opera motifs, virtuosic ballet sequences, and Western orchestral music combine to create spectacles that glorify peasants, soldiers, and the Party. During the Cultural Revolution, these plays and their vividly-colored widescreen film adaptations were the only ones audiences could see. This documentary includes footage of these sensational films as well as interviews with stars made famous by them. The memory of the Yang Ban Xi brings forth both distress and a sense of nostalgia. (In English and Chinese with English subtitles.) The New York Times called it: “Absorbing, shrewdly intelligent.” [Ibid]

In “Yang Ban Xi: the Eight Model Works” the Cultural Revolution is over but the eight model revolutionary works commissioned by Madame Mao — vivid hybrids of Beijing opera, ballet, and symphonic music — live on. Yan Ting Yuen’s documentary explores their origins and form, and their ongoing appeal to young Chinese such as rock musician Zhao Wei. She also follows the now middle-aged original prima ballerina of The Red Detachment of Women, Xue Qinghua, as she reprises the role of a lifetime to rapturous applause.

“Children of the Revolution”, directed by David Hinton, won a BAFTA award (the highest British film/television award). It reunites classical musicians who studied at Beijing's Central Conservatory of Music but spent most of their time forming Red Guard units and criticizing their teachers during the Cultural Revolution. Eventually sent to the countryside for hard labor, the now middle-aged friends speak of the period with a mixture of regret, anger, and nostalgia. The Independent on Sunday described it as an: “Outstanding documentary... unforgettable story.” [Ibid]

“Chung Kuo China” is directed by the famous Italian cinema master Michelangelo Antonioni. In 1972, Antonioni went to China to make a documentary for Italian television. The resulting film enraged the Communist authorities, who called the filmmaker reactionary, anti-Chinese, and imperialist for showing “barren farmlands, lonely elderlies, tired animals, and broken houses.” The masses were mobilized in a major campaign to criticize a film they had never seen and a filmmaker they had never heard of. The film, not shown in China until 2004 and now rarely seen in the West, is a significant historical text that provides glimpses of a largely inaccessible country during the Cultural Revolution.

“Mask Changing: A Letter To Antonioni” (Bianlian Zhi Andongniaoni de Yi feng Xin) was directed by Pan Jun (2004): Chris Berry, a professor at the University of London, wrote: During the Cultural Revolution, Michelangelo Antonioni made a documentary, Cina (1972), that was immediately banned. When it came out on DVD in China a few years ago, Pan Jun went back to where Antonioni shot, found the people in his film, and showed them the clips. Not only do we get some truths behind the film, but we also witness the sheer joy and excitement of Antonioni’s subjects as they see precious footage from their past.

“Red Art” is a 2008 film directed by Hu Jie and Ai Xiaoming. Under Mao's leadership, art was made to serve the “workers, peasants,soldiers, and the cause of socialism.” A large amount of artwork, including billboard-scaled paintings and mass-produced posters, was created to promote the Party's ideology. In this film, the filmmakers — two of China's most active independent documentary filmmakers — talk to artists, including Liu Chunhua (who created the famous painting-turned-poster Mao Goes to Anyuan) about their participation. Other interview subjects include former Red Guards, academics, and collectors of Cultural Revolution relics and memorabilia who discuss the significance of these artworks then and now.”

Films About the Cultural Revolution

“Hibiscus Town” was controversial yet popular film by director Jin Xie released in China in 1987. Set in the Cultural Revolution and based on a novel by writer Gu Hua, it is about a man falsely accused of being a counter-revolutionary and is sentenced to 10 years in prison. When his sentenced is read his pregnant wife shouts out: ‘survive any means! Survive as cattle and horses do! Movie houses were packed for showings of the film. Jin himself had been sentenced to a “cattle shed,” a prisoner camp designated for intellectuals, after his intellectual mother and father committed suicide.

“Lan Fengzheng” (“The Blue Kite”) by Tian Zhuangzhuang (1993): Tian Zhuangzhuang was punished for Blue Kite by being banned from directing films for 5 years. At the same time charming and chilling, the film follows the childhood of Tietou as he grows up with his mother, through three political movements: the Anti-Rightist Movement (1957), the Great Leap Forward (1959-1960), and the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976). Each movement brings a new father figure into their lives — and takes him away. The official line is that the Cultural Revolution was an aberration in China’s otherwise glorious socialist history. Blue Kite suggests otherwise. It is, of course, banned in China.

“Wo Sui Si Qu” (“Though I Am Gone”) by Hu Jie (2006): Bian Zhongyun was the respected principal of a girls’ high school in Beijing — until her own students beat her to death in August 1966, as the Cultural Revolution reached fever pitch. What would you do if you heard your wife was dying in the ER? Bian’s husband, Wang Qingyao, grabbed his camera. Hu Jie’s remarkable film is not only about the events of that terrible summer when Mao instructed students to “be violent.” It is also a contemplation of the drive to witness and document — to never forget. No one has ever been charged with Bian’s murder. And, for Wang Qingyao, it is just like yesterday.

“Yangguang Canlan De Rizi” (“In the Heat of the Sun”) by Jiang Wen (1994); For many people, the Cultural Revolution was a disastrous “decade of chaos.” But In the Heat of the Sun focuses on those too young to be either victims or Red Guards. Left behind after their parents had been sent down to the countryside to be punished and the schools had all closed, Beijing’s teenagers came of age in an atmosphere of unrestrained and sometimes cruel freedom. The film is the debut of Jiang Wen, who was known before as a lead actor (for example in Zhang Yimou’s Red Sorghum), and has since made films like Devils on the Doorstep (2000) and Let the Bullets Fly (2010). It was adapted from a novel by the “hooligan” author, Wang Shuo.

Meaning of Films About the Cultural Revolution

Chris Berry, a professor of film and television studies at King's University, London, told dGenerate films, “Recent films such as Hu Jie’s “Though I am Gone” , “Searching for Lin Zhao’s Soul” , and “The East Wind State Farm” look back at the Cultural Revolution through a present-day lens. On comparing these with films made in the Cultural Revolution, Berry said, The recent films are independent documentaries, whereas the films from the post-Cultural Revolution era were melodramas, for the most part, and made within the state-owned studio system of the time. The contemporary films are oral histories that are often a last chance for older people to give their testimonies. The government’s line is that the Cultural Revolution has been declared a mistake and dealt with, so there’s no need to make any more films about it. So, I don’t suppose these current documentaries are very welcome, to put it mildly. In fact, I think they are incendiary and I’m not surprised that many of the filmmakers are keeping relatively quiet about them.

On the other hand, I think that most of the post-Cultural Revolution melodramas were part of a process of trying to rebuild trust between the government and the people on the grounds of a shared suffering “Deng Xiaoping suffered during the Cultural Revolution, just as so many ordinary Chinese did. It’s always struck me how the Chinese government and people were ready to go back and make films and write novels about the Cultural Revolution so quickly after it was over. It took the Soviets decades to begin to go into the Stalin era, and the Germans were not really ready to start confronting the legacy of fascism so quickly, either. But that’s where Wang Hui’s point comes in. Repudiating the Cultural Revolution and constructing a very straightforward image of the Cultural Revolution re-legitimized the Party.

Having said all that, I think that the best of the films from that cycle from the late 70s are not so simple. For example, Troubled Laughter shares a self-reflexive quality with Though I Am Gone. In Hu Jie’s film, it’s very striking that the old widower took a camera with him to take pictures of his wife dying in the ER at the hospital after her students had beaten her. It opens a second dimension to the film, so that it becomes a meditation on the need to document and to bear witness as well as a documentary about a specific topic. In the case of Troubled Laughter, the film is all about a journalist who is caught between his desire to tell the truth and all kinds of social and political pressures, including from his own family members, to submit and tell the “truth” that the Cultural Revolution leaders in his town want him to tell. So that film also opens up a lot of questions about what truth is, what the duty and role of an artist or a journalist or a filmmaker is, and so on. In fact, I think it’s weathered the years extremely well, and I hope that people will start to rediscover some of these “forgotten films” soon

Image Sources: YouTube

Text Sources: New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Times of London, The Guardian, National Geographic, The New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, Reuters, AP, Lonely Planet Guides, Compton’s Encyclopedia and various books and other publications.

Last updated October 2021

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of country or topic discussed in the article. This constitutes 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you are the copyright owner and would like this content removed from, please contact me.