STUDYING THE RAINFOREST
Zip-line over rainforest canopy
in Costa Rica Although it is the most biologically diverse place on the planet the canopy is still largely unexplored. Up until recently rainforest scientists were like oceanographers who studied their subject from land. In some cases they collected samples in the upper branches by blasting them down with shotguns or using trained monkeys to fetch them. Today, scientists are actually going up into the canopy with ropes and harnesses like those used rock climbers and belts and spiked boots like those used by telephone pole repairmen.
Describing these methods, David Attenborough wrote: "First, you must get a thin line over a high branch, either by throwing it or by attaching it to an arrow and shooting...Hauling pulls the rope over the branch. Once it has been securely tied, you clip on two metal hand grips. You can slide them upwards but a ratchet prevents them from slipping down wards. With your feet in webbing stirrups, one tied to each grip you slowly host your way up the rope."
Some scientists shun ropes in favor of platforms, steel towers and construction cranes. Observation posts have been set up on gondolas hanging off of aluminum booms, catwalks stretched between trees and bamboo platforms built on top of collapsible ladders. Some scientists have even set up networks of ropes between trees and move over a large area of the canopy to study microclimates and animals. In some cases they stay aloft for days at a time, eating and sleeping in the trees.
rain forest soils In 1989 a team of French scientists studied the canopy in the Amazon used an extraordinary, baseball-diamond-size airborne raft made of rubber pontoons and synthetic fiber netting. Designed by an architect and lowered by dirigible onto the canopy, the raft snuggled in nicely between the tree crowns where it received plenty of support. For safety the scientist were attached to ropes at all the time. To reach the rainforest floor they descended through "manholes" on ropes using hand clamps and harnesses. [Source: Francic Hallé, National Geographic, October 1990].
Websites and Resources: Rainforest Action Network ran.org ; Rainforest Foundation rainforestfoundation.org ; World Rainforest Movement wrm.org.uy ; Wikipedia article Wikipedia ; Forest Peoples Programme forestpeoples.org ; Rainforest Alliance rainforest-alliance.org ; Rainforest Portal rainforestportal.org ; Prince’s Rainforest Project rainforestsos.org/about-rainforests ; Nature Conservancy nature.org/rainforests ; National Geographic environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/habitats/rainforest-profile ; Rainforest Books:
Book: The Private Life of Plants: A Natural History of Plant Behavior by David Attenborough (Princeton University Press, 1997); Portraits of the Rainforest By Adrian Forsythe.
Websites and Resources on Rainforest Animals: Rainforest Animals rainforestanimals.net ; Rainforest Animal Photos mongabay.com ; Rainforest Plant Photos rain-tree.com/plantimages ; Rainforest Animal Photos leslietaylor.net/gallery/animals ; Rainforest Plants wheatonma.edu/rainforest ; Enchanted Learning enchantedlearning.com/subjects/rainforest ; Amazon Plants junglephotos.com
Studying Plants and Animals in the Rainforest
Biologists studying mammals identify animals by wandering through the forest at night listening for calls and looking for reflection of their eyes in their headlamps or by setting traps baited with bananas and peanut butter. The traps are raised to the canopy and lowered with a rope-and-pullet system.
Scientists collect insects using gasoline-powered foggers that look like leaf blowers and use a biodegradable insecticide that causes the insects to drop out of canopy onto plastic sheets below. The captured insects are later hauled to a laboratory where are counted and classified. Insects that are most active at night are attracted using black light. Butterflies are lured with traps that smell like their favorite rotten fruit and other flying insects are trapped in tin cans above ultra-violet light that force them to fly upwards.
Rainforest botanists spend most of their time collecting and identifying species. To gather samples they sometimes follow logging operations and gather life forms from recently felled trees or observe trees from the top of ravines. Sometimes they bring along local forest people adept at climbing trees to collect samples in the upper branches. When the plants flower and fruit the scientists check the plants and the insects and animals they attract.
Today they are so many new species being discovered that the few biologists who can identify rainforest organisms are swamped with new organism given to them by collectors. Wilson said his experience his typical: "Every time I enter a previously unstudied area I find a new species of ant within a day or two, sometimes during the first hour. I search the ground and low vegetation, dig into rotting logs and stumps with a gardeners trowel...On a typical day, the first 40 or 50 colonies encountered might be species already known to science...then a new species. Then another 20 colonies of established species, and one more new species, and so on."▸
Studying Birds in the Rainforest
Costa Rica Santa Elena Skywalk Ornithologists count species by their songs more than by actual sightings. Censuses are taken by catching birds are caught in nets placed in major flyways. When a bird becomes entangled, they generally remain still they are released. In one study in 1987 over 39,000 birds were netted for one study. The birds and animals were counted and sometimes tagged and then released. New species of insect were collected and studied.
Describing what it is like to study birds in the canopy David Anderson of Louisiana State University wrote in Natural History, “I use a crossbow rigged with a fishing reel to fire a “bolt “ (a crossbow arrow) that I have weighted with a lead fishing sinker. The bolt carries the fishing line over a high branch of the tree, and the weight of the sinker brings it back down through the tangle of foliage; I then use the line to draw a parachute cord over the branch, and the parachute cord to pull over the still heavier climbing rope. I tie one end of the rope to another tree, then make my way up the free end using a climbing harness and mechanical ascenders (essentially handholds that slide up but not down ). The whole process is cumbersome, so when it rains I have no choice but to soak it up.”
“Thirty minutes after sunrise I started a three-hour survey. With 10 x 42 Swarovski binoculars in one hand and a mini recorder in the other, I softy narrated the location and behavior of every bird I saw or heard: Chlorophonia , upper third of canopy, outer reaches of foliage, mistletoe berry. Tropical gnatcathcer, middle canopy, butterfly larvae in bill.”
Using Automated Radio Telemetry Systems to Study Rainforest Animals
Reporting from Barro Colorado Island, Panama, Natalie Angier wrote in the New York Times, “We were tramping doggedly through the forest in pursuit of white-faced capuchins, those familiar organ-grinder monkeys with the wild hair, piercing eyes and impatient scowls of little German professors. Capuchins are said to be exceptionally quick-witted, and that morning they might as well have been swinging from their Phi Beta Kappa keys. [Source: Natalie Angier, New York Times, February 2, 2009]
Capuchins are smart, gorgeous and socially sophisticated, and Dr. Crofoot has relished the many hours spent studying them with the traditional field research tools of binoculars, notebook and a saint’s portion of patience. Yet she and other scientists who work here at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute are thrilled with a new system for tracking their subjects that could help revolutionize the labor-intensive business of field biology.
Called the Automated Radio Telemetry System, the method relies on seven 130-foot-high radio towers scattered across the island that can monitor data from many radio-tagged individuals simultaneously, round the clock, through the calendar. Once an animal has been outfitted with a transmitting device, the towers can track its unique radio signature and, by a process of triangulation, indicate where it is on the island, whether it’s moving or at rest, what other radio-endowed individuals it encounters.
The constant data streams feed into computers at a central lab building on the island, allowing researchers to stay abreast of far more animal sagas than they could possibly follow through direct observation, and to make the best of their hours in the field. If you see an extended flat line on your computer monitor, it’s time to go out, retrieve the corpse and figure out what happened. And because transmitters can now be made as light as two-tenths of a gram, scientists can tag and track katydids, orchid bees, monarch butterflies, even plant seeds.
canopy profile “Automated systems like this are ushering in a new era of animal tracking,” said Roland Kays, another institute research associate. “There’s a lot of potential for seeing the routes animals take and the decisions they make every step of the way.” The application of radio telemetry towers, global positioning satellites and other cyberscapes to the mapping and deciphering of the natural world has spawned a new subdiscipline. “Movement ecology is the term being thrown around now,” said Dr. Kays, who is also curator of mammals at the New York State Museum in Albany.
Dr. Kays is applying the tracking system to explore the dynamic ménage à trois among the island’s population of ocelots; the ruddy, snouty rodents called agoutis; and the island’s towering and thickly buttressed Dipteryx trees. The agoutis love Dipteryx seeds, and the ones they don’t eat immediately they bury for later consumption. The Dipteryx needs the agoutis to bury its seeds before ground beetles or other animals destroy them, but then the tree wants the rodent to conveniently disappear. Ocelots love agoutis; the rodents are their most important food source. The question Dr. Kays is asking: How many members of each sector are needed to sustain this tripartite economy?
The telemetry system adds to the scientific luster of an island that has been a research mecca ever since Barro Colorado’s 3,865 acres were separated from the mainland by the construction of the Panama Canal in 1914. “It’s a living laboratory,” said Stefan Schnitzer of the University of Wisconsin. “It’s the most heavily studied piece of forest in the world.”
Of course, what sounds dandy in theory can act buggy in practice, and researchers admitted that the upkeep of a complex computerized network in the pitilessly catabolic conditions of a tropical rain forest is always tricky. Moreover, tagging animals remains difficult, particularly when the subjects are smart and easily spooked, as capuchins are.
Rainforest Fragment Studies
Scientists have studied isolated fragments of Amazon rainforest intentionally left behind in areas cleared for ranching and agriculture to see how large an area is necessary to maintain a healthy population of species. Located about 80 miles south of Manaus, Brazil, the land was cleared into five 1-hectare (about 2.5 acres), five 10-hectare, one 100-hectare, one 1000-hectare and one 10,000-hectare plots of forest. [Source: Edward O. Wilson, National Geographic, December 1991 ┱; Jake Page, Smithsonian magazine, April 1988]
The project began in 1976 and was expected to run until 1999. Baited traps were checked every few days to see how rodents and marsupials are getting on. The one-hectare island of rainforest usually becomes filled with birds after the forest around it has been cleared because the birds that lived in the cleared forest needed somewhere to go. When the food supply of island was depleted six months later the birds too were gone.
In the 10-hectare plots certain species of birds left after the colonies of army ants flushed out crickets, grasshoppers and cockroaches the birds ate. Frog species also disappeared because the peccaries that rutted out the water holes they lived in also disappeared.
The one-and ten-hectare plots become completely edge in a few months. Scientist estimate that a patch of virgin rainforest needs a buffer zone at least a few hundred meters wide to make the sure the edge effect doesn't creep into the virgin forest.
New species moved into the disturbed areas. According to one study, small mammals were more abundant in the disturbed fragments than in the rainforest.
Satellites and Remote Sensing of the World’s Rainforests
Remote sensing devices mounted on high-flying planes and satellites have been used to monitor the rainforest. In some cases land-based scientists check the images against what they observe on the ground and use the data help calibrate instruments, interpret the images and make sure analysis of the images is accurate. To get the most accurate data available harvesters of chicle (the chewy ingredient in gum) have been hired to climb up 100 foot trees and mount devices in the canopy.
Remote sensing devices used to monitor the rainforest include: 1) the Landsat satellite which reads surface temperature and reflected sun light with infra-red photography and is useful in measuring amounts of vegetation, which gives off heat especially at night and shows up red; 2) radar imagery taken from planes at 30,000 feet that can pick up crops growing under trees and fallen logs (an indication of cleared land); and 3) .satellite-based imaging spectrometer that measures vegetation density by monitoring 224 bands on the electromagnetic spectrum (compared to seven on the Landsat) and can determine the chemical composition of different materials
Southeast Asia fires in October 2006
The Thermal Scanner , a sensitive satellite-based devise, can distinguish between crops, recently felled trees, savannah and bare fields (areas that look similar on the Landsat photographs) and portray the landscapes in different colors with cleared land appearing deep blue; upland rainforest, light blue; and swamps, yellow.
Used together these devises can determine plant type and check the effects of environmental changes. Much of the data collected is raw and very complex and it will scientist a while to figure out exactly how to read it. Each remote sensing devise has its draw backs. The radar imagery for example can not tell the difference between a freshly plowed field and one sprouting corn.
Google Unveils Satellite Platform to Aid Forest-Saving Efforts
Reuters reported in 2010, Google has “unveiled technology it says will help build trust between rich and poor countries on projects designed to protect the world’s tropical forests. Measuring the success of forest-protection plans in places like the Amazon, Indonesia and the Congo basin has always been difficult because tree disease, corruption, and illegal logging threaten vast remote areas that scientists can’t monitor by land. [Source: Reuters, December 2, 2010]
The platform, called Google Earth Engine, takes vast amounts of forest images from U.S. and French satellites and crunches it at shared data centres, through cloud computing. It allows scientists to monitor forests from their own computers in minutes or seconds instead of the hours or days it took before. Google also wants to eventually sell access to advanced aspects of the tool to carbon traders, policy makers, and researchers working in forestry.
Satellite view of the Congo basin
In conjunction with Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) programs Google UK has released satellite images of rainforest areas on the Internet, allowing anyone with Internet access to compare images of the same places at different times to monitor deforestation and make sure countries involved with the REDD agreement and keeping their promises. Philipp Schidler of Google UK told the Times of London, “Our engineers are exploring how we might contribute to this effort by developing a global forest platform that would enable anyone in the world, including tropical nations to monitor deforestation and draw attention to it.”
Scientists and Rainforest SWAT Teams
Edward O. Wilson is one of the world most famous biologist and rainforest advocates. A native of Alabama and a professor at Harvard, he has written 22 books, including a Pulitzer Prize-wining encyclopedia on ants, and nearly 400 scholarly articles.
Al Gentry, curator of the Missouri Botanical Garden, has often been described as the man who can identify more tropical plants than anyone else in the world. He has spent a lot of time in rainforests looking for plants and often follows loggers to find new species. As of the late 1990s he had been jailed 15 times for gathering plants in unauthorized areas.
tropical wet forests
Dr. Marc Plotkin, the author of Tales of the Shaman's Apprentice and Medicine Quest: In Search of Nature's Hidden Cure , is a major advocate for the belief that miracle medicines and marketable goods can be found in the rainforest. Plotkin's Amazon Conservation Team is supported by actress Susan Sarandon and Todd Oldham. See Rainforest Products and Medicines.
An ecological SWAT team known as the Rapid Assessment Program (RAP) has been set up by the Washington D.C.-based Conservation International to develop a strategy for saving the rainforest by focusing first on the most threatened rainforests.
The members of RAP list like of Hall of Fame or rainforest scientists. The so called "Bio-squad" included Gentry; Ted Park, a Louisiana State University ornithologist, who can identify most if the New World tropical birds by their songs alone; Louise Emmons, a Smithsonian research associate who wrote the definite pieces on the 18 species of rainforest rat; and Robin Foster, an ecologist for the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, who is an expert at drawing information about rainforests from satellite and aircraft imagery.
Living, Working and Surviving in the Rainforest
Working in the rainforest sometimes comes with high costs. Emmons caught the bubonic plague in Bolivia; Foster has lost two thirds of his liver to various tropical diseases; and Gentry survived being bitten by a pit viper even though he was four hours from the nearest town.
Cloud forest world distribution
Some of the worst accidents occur when scientists get hit by sudden powerful storm while they are up in the canopy. Scientists working in the rainy season sometimes quickly ascend take a few samples, clip a few leaves and then quickly descend to avoid trouble. Relieving oneself or not reliving oneself can present challenge to scientists who spend all day in the treetops in a harness.
The nemesis of all rainforest scientists are termites, stinging wasps and ants. Ants climb into computers and termites eat away the legs of tables and beds. One botanist who suddenly came face to face with a wasp nest in the canopy tried to escape by kicking the tree. His rope snapped and he plummeted 75 feet, crash landing on a root buttress after his wall was broken branches and leaves. Undeterred, he was back in the tree tops that same day.╜
Simply getting to the study sites can be a problem. A smooth logging road can turn to ankle-deep mud after one rainstorm. Thick, wet clay can make boots feel like their full of lead and suck shoes off of feet and clamp on to vehicles like a crocodile clamping gown on a leg. .
cloud forest, secondary forest and farm land in Ecuador
The U.S. Air Force runs a Tropical Survival School in the jungles of Panama to teach pilots how to survive if their planes is shot down in a tropical rainforest. Trainees learn to find edible and medicinal plants, extract water from jungle vines, make a fishing net and a hammock with a parachutes, attract fish with termites, and make huts from palm fronds. One of the most important plants students about learn is the "tinder bush," so named because it contains so much resin that "you can light a fire from it with a single match in a driving rain."
Cabruca refers to a way of cultivating wild cacao (chocolate) trees in the forest by thinning out the understory---trunks, dwarf palms, vines---and planting in clear spaces under the protective canopy. It is a way of farming in the rainforest that keeps the rainforest essentially intact.
New Jungles Growing Faster than Rainforests are Being Destroyed
Elisabeth Rosenthal wrote in the New York Times, “New ‘secondary’ forests are emerging in Latin America, Asia and other tropical regions at such a fast pace that the trend has set off a serious debate about whether saving primeval rain forest---an iconic environmental cause---may be less urgent than once thought. By one estimate, for every acre of rain forest cut down each year, more than 50 acres of new forest are growing in the tropics on land that was once farmed, logged or ravaged by natural disaster. [Source: Elisabeth Rosenthal, New York Times, January 29, 2009]
edge of deforested land in the Amazon About 38 million acres of original rain forest are being cut down every year, but in 2005, according to the most recent “State of the World’s Forests Report” by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, there were an estimated 2.1 billion acres of potential replacement forest growing in the tropics---an area almost as large as the United States. The new forest included secondary forest on former farmland and so-called degraded forest, land that has been partly logged or destroyed by natural disasters like fires and then left to nature. In Panama by the 1990s, the last decade for which data is available, the rain forest is being destroyed at a rate of 1.3 percent each year. The area of secondary forest is increasing by more than 4 percent yearly, estimates Joe Wright, a senior scientist at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
With the heat and rainfall in tropical Panama, new growth is remarkably fast. Within 15 years, abandoned land can contain trees more than 100 feet high. Within 20, a thick rain-forest canopy forms again. Here in the lush, misty hills, it is easy to see rain-forest destruction as part of a centuries-old cycle of human civilization and wilderness, in which each in turn is cleared and replaced by the other. The Mayans first cleared lands here that are now dense forest. The area around Gamboa, cleared when the Panama Canal was built, now looks to the untrained eye like the wildest of jungles.
Value of New Jungles
palm oil plantation
in Borneo Reporting from Chilibre, Panama, Elisabeth Rosenthalwrote in the New York Times, “The land where Marta Ortega de Wing raised hundreds of pigs until 10 years ago is being overtaken by galloping jungle---palms, lizards and ants. Instead of farming, she now shops at the supermarket and her grown children and grandchildren live in places like Panama City and New York. Here, and in other tropical countries around the world, small holdings like Ms. Ortega de Wing’s---and much larger swaths of farmland---are reverting to nature, as people abandon their land and move to the cities in search of better livings.[Source: Elisabeth Rosenthal, New York Times, January 29, 2009]
“There is far more forest here than there was 30 years ago,” said Ms. Ortega de Wing, 64, who remembers fields of mango trees and banana plants. The new forests, the scientists argue, could blunt the effects of rain forest destruction by absorbing carbon dioxide, the leading heat-trapping gas linked to global warming, one crucial role that rain forests play. They could also, to a lesser extent, provide habitat for endangered species.
The idea has stirred outrage among environmentalists who believe that vigorous efforts to protect native rain forest should remain a top priority. But the notion has gained currency in mainstream organizations like the Smithsonian Institution and the United Nations, which in 2005 concluded that new forests were “increasing dramatically” and “undervalued” for their environmental benefits. The United Nations is undertaking the first global catalog of the new forests, which vary greatly in their stage of growth.
“Biologists were ignoring these huge population trends and acting as if only original forest has conservation value, and that’s just wrong,” Wright told the New York Times. He set off a firestorm two years ago by suggesting that the new forests could substantially compensate for rain forest destruction. “Is this a real rain forest?” Dr. Wright asked, walking the land of a former American cacao plantation that was abandoned about 50 years ago, and pointing to fig trees and vast webs of community spiders and howler monkeys.
“A botanist can look at the trees here and know this is regrowth,” he said. “But the temperature and humidity are right. Look at the number of birds! It works. This is a suitable habitat.” Dr. Wright and others say the overzealous protection of rain forests not only prevents poor local people from profiting from the rain forests on their land but also robs financing and attention from other approaches to fighting global warming, like eliminating coal plants.
New Jungles Prompt a Debate on Rain Forests
tea plantation in Uganda Elisabeth Rosenthal wrote in the New York Times, “But other scientists, including some of Dr. Wright’s closest colleagues, disagree, saying that forceful protection of rain forests is especially important in the face of threats from industrialized farming and logging.The issue has also set off a debate over the true definition of a rain forest. How do old forests compare with new ones in their environmental value? Is every rain forest sacred? “Yes, there are forests growing back, but not all forests are equal,” said Bill Laurance, another senior scientist at the Smithsonian, who has worked extensively in the Amazon. [Source: Elisabeth Rosenthal, New York Times, January 29, 2009]
He scoffed as he viewed Ms. Ortega de Wing’s overgrown land: “This is a caricature of a rain forest!? he said. “There’s no canopy, there’s too much light, there are only a few species. There is a lot of change all around here whittling away at the forest, from highways to development.” While new forests may absorb carbon emissions, he says, they are unlikely to save most endangered rain-forest species, which have no way to reach them.
Everyone, including Dr. Wright, agrees that large-scale rain-forest destruction in the Amazon or Indonesia should be limited or managed. Rain forests are the world’s great carbon sinks, absorbing the emissions that humans send into the atmosphere, and providing havens for biodiversity. At issue is how to tally the costs and benefits of forests, at a time when increasing attention is being paid to global climate management and carbon accounting.
But Dr. Laurance says that is a dangerous lens through which to view the modern world, where the forces that are destroying rain forest operate on a scale previously unknown. Now the rain forest is being felled by “industrial forestry, agriculture, the oil and gas industry---and it’s globalized, where every stick of timber is being cut in Congo is sent to China and one bulldozer does a lot more damage than 1,000 farmers with machetes,” he said.
Effect of New Jungles on Carbon Emissions
Elisabeth Rosenthal wrote in the New York Times, “Globally, one-fifth of the world’s carbon emissions come from the destruction of rain forests, scientists say. It is unknown how much of that is being canceled out by forest that is in the process of regrowth. It is a crucial but scientifically controversial question, the answer to which may depend on where and when the forests are growing. [Source: Elisabeth Rosenthal, New York Times, January 29, 2009]
Although the United Nations’ report noted the enormous increase of secondary forests, it is unclear how to describe or define them. The 2.1 billion acres of secondary forests includes a mishmash of land that has the potential to grow into a vibrant faux rain forest and land that may never become more than a biologically shallow tangle of trees and weeds.
Regenerated forests in the tropics appear to be especially good at absorbing emissions of carbon, but that ability is based on location and rate of growth. A field abandoned in New York in 1900 will have trees shorter than those growing on a field here that was abandoned just 20 years ago.
palm plantation in Cigudeg, Indonesia
Study of New Jungles
Little is known about the new forests---some of them have never even been mapped---and they were not factored into the equation at the meetings. “Our knowledge of these forests is still rather limited,” said Wulf Killmann, director of forestry products and industry at the United Nations agriculture organization. The agency is in the early phases of a global assessment of the scope of secondary forest, which will be ready in 2011. [Source: Elisabeth Rosenthal, New York Times, January 29, 2009]
The Smithsonian, hoping to answer such questions, is just starting to study a large plot of newly abandoned farmland in central Panama to learn about the regeneration of forests there.
New Jungles and Biodiversity
Elisabeth Rosenthal wrote in the New York Times, “For many biologists, a far bigger concern is whether new forests can support the riot of plant and animal species associated with rain forests. Part of the problem is that abandoned farmland is often distant from native rain forest. How does it help Amazonian species threatened by rain-forest destruction in Brazil if secondary forests grow on the outskirts of Panama City? [Source: Elisabeth Rosenthal, New York Times, January 29, 2009]
Dr. Wright, looking at a new forest, sees possibility. He says new research suggests that 40 to 90 percent of rain-forest species can survive in new forest. Dr. Laurance focuses on what will be missing, ticking off species like jaguars, tapirs and a variety of birds and invertebrates. While he concedes that a regrown forest may absorb some carbon, he insists, “This is not the rich ecosystem of a rain forest.”
Image Source: Mongabay mongabay.com ; Wikicommons
Text Sources: The Private Life of Plants: A Natural History of Plant Behavior by David Attenborough (Princeton University Press, 1997); National Geographic articles. Also the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Smithsonian magazine, Natural History magazine, Discover magazine, Times of London, The New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, Reuters, AP, AFP, Lonely Planet Guides, Compton’s Encyclopedia and various books and other publications.
Last updated March 2011