ISLAMISTS, MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND FUNDAMENTALISM

ISLAMISTS, MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND FUNDAMENTALISM

20120709-khomeni.JPG
Ayatollah Khomeni
Islamic fundamentalists, Islamists and Muslim extremists believe that countries with large Muslim populations should become Muslim states governed by Sharia (Islamic Law). They generally want a return to some kinds of Islamic purity, despise modernism and the West, and blame them a number of problems. They also oppose peace with Israel and are hostile to the West and secular leaders in the Muslim world. Their primary beef is with the West and leaders and people in their own societies that have been Westernized and one of their primary goals is to get rid of them.

Islamic fundamentalists, Islamists and Muslim extremists are similar but not exactly the same. Islamism and Islamist are terms used to describe a variety of modern reform movements that aim to “restore” Islam to political power. Islamic fundamentalists reject modernism and secularism and call for a return to religious purity. Muslim extremists are Islamists and fundamentalists with extreme views.

Fundamentalists are not unique to Islam. Many scholars don’t like the term fundamentalism. The are Jewish fundamentalists, Christian fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Sikh fundamentalists and even Buddhist fundamentalists. Most of these groups reject modernism and secularism and call for a return to religious purity. The term originated in the United States in the early 20th century as a way of distinguishing some radical Protestant churches from other Protestant churches.

There are degrees of fundamentalism. Some simply want to check the spread of Western ways in the Muslim world. Some support a moderate form of Muslim law. Others, like the Taliban support a more extreme and severe form of Muslim law. Yet others support anti-Western Muslim terrorists like Osama bin Laden. Terms like Islamist and Muslim extremists have similar meanings as fundamentalists. A jihadist is someone who embraces militant Islam.

Book: The Suicide of Reason: Radical Islam’s Threat to the West by Lee Harris (Basic Books)

Beliefs of Islamists, Muslim Extremists and Fundamentalists

20120709-Hezbollah HassanNasrallah poster.jpg
Hezbollah's Hassan Nasrallah
Most Islamist, fundamentalist and Muslim extremist groups want to introduce or strengthen the use of Sharia---Islamic law---which emphases the puritanical form of Islam and bans or at least frowns on up things like music, alcohol, and women rights. They tend to be anti-Semitic and believe Jewish conspiracy theories and have other bigoted, reactionary views.

Islamists believe that the foreigners, and Americans in particular, damage Muslim religion, culture and society. The Islamic agenda is pushed by Islamic schools, charities and satellite television stations, many based in the oil rich countries such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, and supported with money from the governments in these countries. These groups spend billions of dollars getting out their message and sometimes preach blatant hatred towards the West.

Islamists often view many things as haraam (“forbidden”). These can include pet dogs, unveiled women and even music. Cheerful, polite young men that embrace Muslim extremism often become cold and stern. They sneer with contempt at anything associated with the West and refuse to shake hands with women or even look at them. For some, whenever music is played on a television or radio they turn it off or leave the room. The treatment of women, women’s clothing and how women should act in society are all important issues to Islamists. Islamist women are often identified by garments that cover their entire face and hide the shape of their bodies. Islamist men are often identified by their long, unkept beards. A long beard, Afghan-style clothes and burqas are obvious signs of Islamic fundamentalism.

Paul Berman, author of Power and Idealist wrote in the New York Times, “Radical Islam is a modern philosophy, not just a heap of medieval prejudices. In its sundry versions, it draws on local and religious roots, just as it claims to do. But it also draws on totalitarian institutions from 20th-century Europe.

Muslim extremists, Islamists and Islamic fundamentalists may preach global jihad and violence or they may not. Fareed Zakaria wrote in Newsweek, groups with an Islamist agenda “stunt their countries and dishonor their religions. But not all Islamists advocate global jihad, host terrorists or launch operations against the outside world---in fact, most do not. Consider, for example, the most difficult example, the Taliban. The Taliban have done all kinds of terrible things in Afghanistan, But so far, no Afghan Taliban has participated in any significant level in a global terrorist attack over the past 10 years---including 9/11. There are certainly element of the Taliban that are closely associated with Al Qaida, but the Taliban is large, and many factions have little connection to Osama bin laden. Most Taliban want Islamic rule locally, not violent jihad globally.”

See Sayyid Qutb Under the Muslim Brotherhood and Political Parties

Support for Fundamentalism

20120709-Mus Broth 800px-A2007.jpg
Muslim Brotherhood
Although many terrorists have fundamentalist views and many fundamentalist sympathize with aims of terrorist groups, it is still a big leap from fundamentalism to terrorism and few fundamentalists become terrorists. By some counts, 10 to 15 percent of the Muslim population support fundamentalists and Muslim extremists.

In many repressive Muslim countries, Islamist groups have been the principal opposition. In many cases these groups have been repressed by their governments. Where Islamic states have taken hold they have failed to deliver economic prosperity and human rights. There has been a conflict between the Iranian concept for fundamentalism and the Saudi-Wahhabi view. Both has vied for dominance in the Arab world

Many fundamentalist groups feel threatened, and often those fears are not unwarranted. They are often brutally repressed by their governments. This repression breeds resentment and fear and the creation of underground anti-government cells and this in turn often leads to a cycle of more extremist views and actions and repression by the governments.

Islamists have been successful winning popular support even though their political parties have been banned because they are well organized and operate through mosques. Islamists have made great headway in democracies. Islamist parties such as the Shiite-dominated United Iraqi Alliance, Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood have all done well in elections.

Reasons for Fundamentalism


Six Day War in Israel
Many Muslims remain poor and feel betrayed by corrupt leaders backed by the West. They have looked to religion for answers and have been swayed by Islamic leaders who condemn the West and modernity. The Economist's Brian Beedham said that many Muslim fundamentalists are "simple and emotional people" led by politicians "unscrupulously willing to use Islam as a banner, and a weapon, against the outside world."

Fundamentalists have been described as being "religious-minded" without "religiosity," meaning they regard themselves as religious but don’t necessarily follow the message of their religion. Fundamentalists tend be very selective with their religion, choosing scripture and tenants supporting their positions rather than following the religion as a whole.

Muslim fundamentalists groups are not much different in their goals and methods than Christian and Hindu fundamentalist groups. They all tend to interpret their scriptures literally and select the scriptures that support their beliefs and agenda. If you criticize them you criticize God and deserve to be dealt with harshly.

It has been argued that "fundamentalism is not the result of the spread of Western values, but the fact that these values spread and can not be satisfied. The way to stem extremism is to offer the people a real hope of prosperity."

History of Fundamentalism


Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan
oath of allegiance
Influential figures that helped shape modern fundamentalism include Jamal al-Dun al-Afghani (1838-1897), a Persian Shiite who was leader of the Islamic unity movement which called for Muslim nations to unite to answer the threat posed by the posed by the West; Shaik Muhammad Abdul of Egypt (1849-1905), who was concerned with interpreting Islamic law so that it observed the basic principals of Islam. Jamal al-Dun al-Afghani and Shaik Muhammad Abdul were both regarded as neo-Wahabbist and were an inspiration to the founders of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Abdul Ala Mawdudi (1903-79), the founder of the Jamaat-Islami party in Pakistan, is regarded by some as the father of modern Islamic fundamentalism. He opposed secularism, called for a return to Sharia law, called jihad a central tenet of Islam, and called on Muslim to resist Western modernism. Indian-born Sayyid Abul A’la Mawdudi was one the first to call for a return of the caliphate.

See Wahhabism, the Muslim Brotherhood

Early Palestinian militancy and political activism was based more on ideas of Arab nationalism and Marxist-Leninism than Islamic beliefs. The modern fundamentalist movement got going in earnest in the 1970s and gained momentum with the Iranian Revolution. The rebirth of Islam is attributed to social dislocation, economic hardship, and political frustration. Religious fervor that began in Iran in 1979 has been intensified by feelings of disgusts toward Israel have spread across the entire Muslim world.

The Islamic movement took root in the Middle East and spread to other Muslim countries. It began as a reaction to Arab nationalism and the failure of political states to address the unequal distribution of wealth and the failure of ordinary people to be able to address the problem in their lives. The movement looked to Sharia as the solution to the problem rather that secularism and Western political ideology. One Egyptian diplomat told Reuter, after the Arab defeat in 1967 to Israel and lack of success of secularism in Muslim countries "there was disillusionment. People began to return to godly laws they had abandoned. People were searching for an identity and they had no alternatives to Islam, in which they saw an identity and a solution."

The Middle East has become more Islamic in the last 30 years. More women wear head scarves and more mosques are being built than in the past. Many new buildings have been built with special prayer areas.

By the 1980s, Islam had entered political discussions in a way it hadn’t before. Reason for this include the involvement of conservative rural peasants in the political arena; the migration of these people to the cities; the large number of disenfranchised people in the cities and the spread of the mass media. Different groups have different agendas and use Islam in different ways. Sometimes the same group, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, can be different on different countries.

Iran Revolution and the Mecca Revolt

20120709-khomeni Iranian Revolution.jpg
Iranian Revolution
Iran has been a leader in the Islamist movement. The Iran Revolution of 1979 caused a rebirth of Islam among people in the Middle East suffering from social dislocation, economic hardship, and political frustration. Religious fervor that began in Iran in 1979 and has been intensified by feelings of disgust towards Israel have spread across the entire Muslim world.

The Iran Revolution of 1979 dramatically changed the Middle East, ushering in a period of instability and unrest. The Iranian leaders encouraged Shiite minorities in all of the Middle East to rise up against the Sunni majority. Many scholars view the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s as an effort to contain the rise of Shiite influence in Iraq, Lebanon and the Persian Gulf.

In November 1979, a group of about a 350 armed Muslim radicals, stormed the Grand Mosque during morning prayers in Mecca---Islam’s holiest site. Inspired in part by the Iranian Revolution, they demanded that one of their members be declared a mahdi, a Muslim equivalent of a messiah. When the chief imam at the mosque said that such a claim was heretical, shooting broke out and the radicals took hostages.

Most of the radicals were Saudis but there also Egyptians, Kuwaitis, Pakistanis, Sudanese Yemenis, Somalis and one Ethiopian. The group claimed that their aim was to “purify Islam” and liberate the Holy Land from the royal “clique of infidels.” The leaders of the radicals used loudspeakers to condemn the West and their Saudi accomplices and called for a return to basic Islamic values. They also demanded the banning of Shiites from Mecca’s shrines and the end of women’s higher education, television and soccer.

The 26 gates of the Great Mosque were closed and bolted and the radical were sealed inside. Members of the Saudi army, National Guard, and Ministry of Interior forces surrounded the mosque and sharp shooters were placed in the minarets. Perhaps 50,000 worshipers were trapped inside. The radicals hid in the mosque’s maze of subterranean tunnels. The siege lasted for two weeks and ended only after bloody battles within the mosque itself. Three bullets struck the Kaaba. The minarets were so shot up they had to undergo extensive repairs. The revolt caused great upheaval in Muslim world community and was a great embarrassment to the Saudi royal family, guardians if Islam’s holiest shrines. An estimated 250 people were killed. The leader of the radicals and 62 of his followers were beheaded.

Activities of Muslim Extremists

Muslim extremists in Iraq have gone around to neighborhoods with fliers and posters with edicts banning vices such as “music-filled parties and all kinds of singing,” “gunfire celebrations at weddings,” “gatherings of young men” at markets and outside girls’ schools, “the selling of liquor and narcotic drugs and “wearing improper Western clothes and having long hair.”

In its most extreme, fundamentalist beliefs about purity are used to kill just about anyone in the name of reviving the days of the Prophet. In 2006, several Baghdad falafel vendors were killed by Islamists because falafels didn’t exist in the 7th century.

20120709-Vieled women Bild_137-012602_Turkinnen.jpg
Veiled women

Mansour al-Nogaidan, a Bahraini-based journalist, wrote in the Washington Post, that he witnessed a fair amount of hypocrisy and corruption in the fundamentalist world. “I saw Islamic judges, ignoring the marks of torture bourne by my prison comrades. I learned of Islamic teachers who molested their students. I heard devout Muslims who never missed the five daily prayers lying with ease to people who did not share their extremist beliefs.”

Opposition to Muslim Fundamentalism

Some have argued that the best way to combat radical Islam is to forges bonds with traditionalists who reject Western decadence and secularism but also shun violence and extremism. On his effort to challenge fundamentalists al-Nogaidan wrote: “My old companions from the jihad felt obliged to declare themselves either with me or against me. Some preferred to cut their links to me silently, but others fought me publically, issuing statements filled with curses and lies...I became a favorite target in the Internet, where my writings were lambasted and labeled blasphemous...Eventually I was fired.”

In 2010, the third place finisher on the popular Middle Eastern television show Million’s Poet was Saudi housewife Missal Halal who, draped in a black Ababa and face-covering niqab, performed a stinging piece called the Chaos of the Fatwas that won a standing ovation from the audience. The poem lashed out at Muslim fundamentalists, accusing them of “preying like a wolf” on those who seek progress and peace, and compared suicide bombers as “monsters wearing belts.”

Hilal told the Times of London, “I entered the competition because I felt that this was my chance to speak to a lot of people to express my feelings about life, love and the situation we are in today. I felt I had to say that across the Arab world we are afraid of extremism and the effect it has had. What sort of society do they offer us? They offer nothing but fear, I hate it so much.”


Taliban bounty leaflet

“They are killing the true spirt of religion. It should be found in mercy, forgiveness, love. They try to stop us connecting with other people, to keep us frightened and alone...Arab women are strong and brave but we used to be much more free than we are today. We were allowed to make coffee for our guest, to speak to our neighbor. But the extremist took away the true spirit of our society and now men and women mistrust each other.”

Image Sources: Wikimedia Commons

Text Sources: New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Times of London, The Guardian, National Geographic, The New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, Reuters, AP, AFP, Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic Monthly, The Economist, Global Viewpoint (Christian Science Monitor), Foreign Policy, Wikipedia, BBC, CNN, NBC News, Fox News and various books and other publications.

Page Top

© 2008 Jeffrey Hays

Last updated July 2012

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of country or topic discussed in the article. This constitutes 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you are the copyright owner and would like this content removed from factsanddetails.com, please contact me.