ISLAND DISPUTE BETWEEN CHINA AND JAPAN IN 2010 AND RELATIONS AFTER THE 2011 TSUNAMI IN JAPAN

ISLAND DISPUTE BETWEEN CHINA AND JAPAN IN 2010

20111031-Kan Kantei china 22jck1_1.jpg
Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan with a less than cordial Wen Jiabao of China
In early September 2010, a major diplomatic row broke out between Japan and China when the captain of a Chinese trawler was arrested and taken into custody by Japanese authorities after his vessel collided with two Japanese Coast Guard (JCG) vessels in waters in Japan’s 22-kilometer contiguous zone off the Senkaku Islands, Japanese islands also claimed by China. The trawler collided with the Japanese vessels after it ignored orders to stop. The captain, 41-year-old Zhan Qixiong, was held on charges of illegally fishing in Japanese waters, trying to evade an inspection by the Japanese Coast Guard (JPG) and obstructing JCG duties by deliberately ramming the trawler into the JCG ship. The Chinese claim the trawler was not fishing illegally because the islands belong to China. Fourteen other Chinese crew members were initially detained but they were soon after released. Only Zhan was detained for a length of time.

The Japanese claimed the matter would be dealt with in accordance with Japanese law. Video images of the collision clearly show that the Chinese trawler deliberately ramming the JCG patrol vessel Mizuki. Japanese foreign minister Seiji Maehara told reporters, “It was clear the Chinese fishing boat rammed into [the JCG vessel]. If it wasn’t intentional [the Chinese boat] would’ve reversed its engines and tried to move but the footage doesn’t show that.” The video also shows the Japanese and Chinese vessels initially going on a parallel course with the Chinese trawler then veering towards the JCG boat.

Edward Wong wrote in the New York Times that Japanese newspapers speculated at length on the background of Zhan, the Chinese trawler captain: “Some call him a Chinese naval officer. Mr. Zhan has declined to talk to journalists. He and his employer, Wu Tianzhu, who owns 10 fishing vessels in Mr. Zhan’s home county in Fujian Province, do not work with the Chinese military, said Mr. Wu’s wife, who gave her name only as Ms. Chen because of the delicacy of discussing security matters. Mr. Zhan has been a fisherman all his life, she said.”[Source: Edward Wong, New York Times, October 5, 2010]

“About three years ago, an official document circulated in Shenhu County, where Mr. Zhan lives, telling fishermen not to go to the disputed waters, an employee at a local fishing information center who identified himself only as Mr. Chen, told the New York Times. But there has been no such warning in recent years, he added. “Gradually, more and more boats went to fish there, especially when the harvest was not good enough in other areas,” he said. “More boats went there last year and this year.” [Ibid]

In late September, Wong reported, as the China-Japan feud was unfolding, the Chinese fisheries bureau invited a Chinese reporter from Global Times to come aboard a going on a regular run to the Diaoyu Islands. The reporter, Cheng Gang, wrote of a run-in between the Chinese civilian ship and three Japanese Coast Guard ships: The Japanese ships asked the fisheries boat to turn around. The Chinese vessel replied via transmitter: “We are a Chinese fisheries administration boat. The Diaoyu Islands are China’s indigenous territory, and we are carrying out official duties in Chinese territorial waters. We ask you to leave immediately!”

China’s Hardball Response to the Island Dispute in 2010

A spokesperson for the Chinese government said the islands were “inherently the territory of China” and warned that “if Japan continues in this reckless fashion, it will taste its own bitter fruit.” Beijing lodged several complaints about the arrest of the captain including one by a high-level deputy prime minister in which the Japanese ambassador was summoned in the middle of the night. China also called off talks on resolving disputes on claims over natural gas deposits in waters near the islands.

Tours by Chinese to Japan were cancelled and invitations to Japanese students to visit Expo 70 were withdrawn. Travel companies in China were told by the government to refrain from arranging package tours.Concerts b the Japanese pop group SMAP were postponed. An art show in Beijing with participants from Japan was canceled. The story was at the top of the news in China and Japan almost everyday during the stand off, with some Chinese sources saying the whole thing was orchestrated by the Japanese government so it didn’t come across as being so militarily weak. A number of Japanese canceled the travel plans to China.

Four Japanese nationals, employed by Fujita, a second-tier general contractor, were detained in Hebei Province in China for allegedly entering a military zone on the outskirts of Shijiazhuang without permission and videotaping facilities there. The Fujita workers were in China researching the disposal of chemical weapons left in China by Japan after World War II in hopes of getting a Japanese -funded contract to dispose of them. They were scheduled to stay in China for two or three days.

There were fears of a serious economic fallout over the issue such as a boycott of Japanese goods or retaliation again factories producing Japanese goods in China or against Japanese citizens. China did impose an effective ban on the exports of rare earths and silicon---materials critical in the electronics and automobile industry and of which China is one of the sole suppliers---by initiating customs procedures such as requiring documents to be in Chinese, a deviation from usual practices, that halted the shipments. All 31 Japanese company involved in he rare trade said their businesses had been hampered by the Chinese export restrictions.

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao demanded that the Japan “immediately and unconditionally” release the captain of the trawler that collided with the Japanese coast guard ship. “The Diaoyu islands are China’s sacred territory, the arrest of the captain is definitely an illegal act,” he said, adding that the Chinese government has taken measures it has because “Japan has made no effort to listen to us.” He said “If Japan goes its own way and continues with judiciary proceedings, China will take further action. Japan should bear all responsibility for the serious consequences that will arise” from its action. Japan insisted it would follow domestic law and not let foreign pressure decides the case. Jiabao ruled out meeting with Japanese leaders and suspended Chinese government contacts with Japan.

Anti-Japanese Protest in China Over the Island Issue

Chinese nationalists staged anti-Japanese protest that in some cases became violent when Chinese security forces tried to break them up. One boisterous demonstrations with around 100 Chinese activists was staged outside the Japanese Embassy in Beijing. Some protesters there carried signs that read “Burn you Japan !” and shouted “Boycott Japanese products!” The were also protests outside Japanese consulates in Shanghai, Shenyang and Shenzhen.

Thousands took to the streets in Chengdu, unfurling banners and shouting slogans such “Defend the islands” and “Fight Japan.” Protestors there broke into the Japanese retailers Ito-Yokado and Isetan and broke windows. One witness told the Yomiuri Shimbun, “One after another, young people on the roadside joined the procession of university students, and the number of protestors quickly swelled...Police soon lost control.” In Tianjin an international school was attacked by angry Chinese. In Xian, thousands of college students marched while holding flags and banners, shouting slogans such as “Boycott Japanese goods.” Windows were broken and display cases were shattered at Mizuno and Sony retail stores.

In Zhengzhou, college students assembled in the downtown square and marched through the streets , shouting “Long live the motherland” and “Return the islands to China.” There were also anti-Japanese protests in Wuhan, Hebei Province and Deyang and Minyang, Sichuan Province, where more than 10,000 people gathered. In Deyang protesters referred to Japan using a derogatory term that roughly translated to “small Japan” and waved placards reading “Listen to the Voice of the Fatherland.” In Miyang protestors broke windows of Japanese cars and trashed a Japanese restaurant. [Source: Kyodo]

A chat room for the Chinese newspaper Global Times was shut down because of anonymous calls for the slaughter of Japanese citizens. Japan’s Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara gave Beijing some credit for its efforts to reign and limit in the protests. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu spoke out against acts of violence by demonstrators but showed no opposition to the protests themselves. Ma accepted anti-Japan demonstrations as a "display of patriotic passion," saying: "It's understandable that some people expressed their outrage at the recent erroneous words and actions of the Japanese side [over the Senkakus]."

There were some anti-Chinese rallies in Japan. At one in event in Tokyo about 1,000 people gathered and carried banners with messages such as “Japan is in Danger!” and “Don’t Forgive invader China .” Some of the largest cheers rose up from the crowds when a nationalist politicians accused China for being ungrateful for all Japan has done for it.

Analysis of Island Dispute in 2010

Some analysts said he protest were more of a manifestation of bent-up frustrations by Chinese university students than overt hostility towards the Japanese and the trawler collision and islands were mainly a trigger for the anger.

Chinese pundits predicted the Japanese would eventually cave in to Chinese demands. Zhou Young, a professor of Japanese Studies a China Foreign Affairs University told Kyodo, China has “more cards in its hand than the Japanese as their economy is largely dependant on China.” Some analysts argued that China had chosen this moment to play hardball with Japan to take advantage of Japan’s relatively inexperienced government and deteriorating relations between Japan and the United States over the Futenma Air Base in Okinawa. Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said China was taking advantage of a “chill” in Japan-U.S. Relations and that Beijing was “testing what the could get away with.” he also saw the move as warning to Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines over the Spratly Islands.

Other countries---namely Russia’seemed to use the dispute as an opportunity to give Japan a hard time or put pressure on it. Russian President Medvedev called the Kurils---a group of island claimed by both Japan and Russia but occupied by Russia—“a very important region for our country” and said he planned to be the first Russian leader to visit them. He did this around the same time he met Chinese President Hu Jintao to commemorate the end of World War II, during which both Russia and China were adversaries of Japan. The leaders of Russia nad China seemed very friendly. They signed a joint statement of cooperation that among other thing stated that Japan “fabricated history” to stake its claim on the Senkaku islands. The United States asked Japan to stop its development of an oil field in Iran, and Japan did.

Around the time of the island dispute the Japanese defense ministry released a white paper expressing concern about China’s military build up and the movement of what appeared to drilling equipment into a gas field near the disputed islands by Chinese ships. Many wondered why the Japanese politician Ichiro Ozawa---who has good connections with Chinese leaders but just lost a DPJ leadership race to Prime Minister Kan---and other Japanese politicians with good connections in China didn’t try to exert more ifleunce to end the crisis.

Chinese Military and Island Dispute in 2010

Some Japanese officials said the Chinese military was behind China’s hardline stance on the Senkaku Islands, saying it was in charge of policy during the dispute rather than China’s Foreign Ministry, which normally handles such matters.

Some analysts said the way China behaved during the island dispute was a sign that the Chinese military had gained more influence in foreign affairs. One diplomat told the Los Angeles Times, “The military has its own interests. The greater the tensions, the bigger the budget they get.” Some think that China’s hardline stance had something to do with the showdown between military leaders and political leaders in China in the run up to selecting new leaders and filling other important positions in 2012, when President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao have to retire.

John Pomfret wrote in the Washington Post that the incident showed that a “new generation of officials in the military, key government ministries and state-owned companies” has left diplomats in Washington and around the world straining at “how difficult it is to contend with the explosion of special interests shaping China’s worldview.”

Chinese Military and Its Use of Fishing Vessels

Edward Wong wrote in the New York Times: “The number of Chinese civilian boats operating in disputed territory and that of the run-ins they have with foreign vessels, including warships, are on the rise, American and Asian officials say. The boats often have no obvious military connections, and none have been discovered for the trawler the Japanese detained. But foreign officials and analysts say there is evidence showing that they sometimes coordinate their activities with the Chinese Navy. China’s navy is seeking to expand a maritime militia of fishing vessels and to enhance its control over civilian agencies that regulate activities in coastal waters.” [Source: Edward Wong, New York Times, October 5, 2010]

“The Chinese Navy is determined to create a long-range global presence by modernizing its fleet. But the use of civilian boats is part of a different goal---to better defend and more firmly assert sovereignty over China’s coast, its territorial waters and the exclusive economic zones that extend 200 nautical miles off the coast. Using civilians is a crucial part of the doctrine that Chinese military officials call “people’s war.” Dennis J. Blasko, a former military attaché at the United States Embassy in Beijing, told the New York Times the Chinese military articulated this in 2006 in a white paper on national defense. “The Navy is enhancing research into the theory of naval operations and exploring the strategy and tactics of maritime people’s war under modern conditions,” the paper said. [Ibid]

“The Chinese Navy uses civilian vessels in several ways. One is to command militias made of fishing vessels,” Wong wrote. “Another is to coordinate operations with five maritime law enforcement groups that have some of the same functions as the United States Coast Guard, most notably the Fisheries Law Enforcement Command, which is charged by the Agriculture Ministry with enforcing fishing bans and operates regularly in disputed waters. Some fisheries officials now go out on boats wearing uniforms and carrying firearms, said Bernard D. Cole, a former officer in the United States Navy and a professor at the National War College. [Ibid]

As for relying on fishermen, military exercises off the coast of Fujian Province and comments by Chinese officials show that the Chinese Navy has been trying to “more effectively organize China’s maritime militia, based on various fishing fleets,” Mr. Cole said. “The maritime militia in 2010 is quite active.” A Pentagon report last year noted that in May 2008, two Chinese warships were supplied with ammunition and fuel at a designated spot off Zhejiang Province by fishing vessels that belonged to the naval militia.

Japan Releases the Chinese Captain: and End of the Island Dispute

About two weeks after the collision between the Chinese trawler and the Japanese coast guard ship, the captain of the trawler was set free by a court in Naha, Okinawa, which had jurisdiction over the case. Prosecutors said it had taken into account Sino-Japanese relations, but made its decision based on the fact it couldn’t prove the Chinese captain deliberately rammed the Japanese vessel. No one believed that the court made the decision by itself. The understanding was that it had been pressured to release the captain in some way by the Japanese national government. The decision came soon over Chinese authorities arrested the four Fujita workers in China. The captain was taken to China in a private get chartered by the Chinese government. He received a hero’s welcome on his return to China. When he got off the plane he raised both hands into the air and made V signs. (Charges against him were dropped in January 2011).

The release of the Chinese captain was widely seen within Japan and by the international community as Japan being “weak-kneed” and caving in too easily to China’s demands. Opposition parties had a field day criticizing the Kan government for bowing to China. Conservative LDP lawmaker Mobuteru Ishihara said, the government’s response was “diplomatically tone deaf and a historic blunder.” At the time of the captain’s release both Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan and Chinese Premier Jiabao were in New York. Each had contacts with U.S. government, giving the impression that Obama administration wanted the matter settled as soon as possible and it had pressured Japan. However Kan denied any political pressure had been put on Haha prosecutors to release the captain.

China Continues Being Belligerent After Japan Releases the Chinese Captain

To everyone’s surprise China was not satisfied. It continued pressuring Japan for an apology and compensation for damages. Patrols by Chinese fisheries patrol boats near he island were stepped up. School trips, exchanges and tours remained canceled. Customs restrictions in rare earths remained in place. Jiabao said, “If Japanese clings to its mistake, China will take further action and the Japanese side shall bear all consequences that arise.”

Japan was shocked by China’s demand for an apology and compensation. In response Japan demanded compensation for damage to the Japanese coast vessels and sent more patrol boats into the South China Sea. Japan proposed stationing troops near the Senkaku islands.

Finally, about five days after the captain was released China began to back down. The rhetoric was toned down. Customs procedures returned to normal and shipments or rare earths and materials resumed. Perhaps the biggest sign that things were finally mellowing was the selection of a Japanese woman in a China panda keeper contest. Three of the four Fujitsu workers were freed. China’s Xinhua news service said the three “had acknowledged they had been engaged in activities that violated Chinese laws and submitted a document stating they repented their mistake.” On their returns to Japan the Fujiata employees said they didn’t know they had enters a restricted area. The last Fujita worker was released about three weeks after the four were arrested.

In early October Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan flew to Brussels to attend the biennial Asia-Europe Meeting, a meeting he initially had not planned to attend, so he could talk to Jiabao, who was also at the meeting. The leaders met informally for a 25-minute “chat,” according to the Chinese, in a hall using an interpreter that spoke English but not the other’s language. The Japanese foreign ministry initially said the meeting “began spontaneously while the two leaders were walking” in the same direction but later it was revealed that the meeting had been arranged---albeit hastily---15 minutes before. Both Kan and Jiabao stood by their country’s claims to the islands but agreed bad relations between the two countries served no one’s interest and agreed to improve bilateral relations, resume exchanges and hold high-level talks in the near future. The day after the meeting, Chinese vessels that were patrolling the near the disputed islands withdrew.

Later in October at an ASEAN summit in Hanoi, a meeting between Wen and Kan was cancelled by China just minutes before it was supposed to begin. At that time Chinese Assistant Foreign Affairs Minister Hu Zhengyue accused Japan of “bandying words infringing on China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.” At the last minute a ten minute meeting was hastily arranged. Perhaps most embarrassing for Japan was a photo op in which it appeared that Wen refused to shake Kan’s hand and the President of South Korea Lee Myung Bak had to force the Chinese and Japanese leaders to join hands.

Kan met with Chinese President Hu Jintao for 22 minutes during the APEC summit in Yokohama in November 2011. In the meeting Kan said he told Hu “the Senkaku Islands are the inherent territory of Japan” and “there’s no territorial dispute---over the islands. In photos from that meeting Hu looked uneasy to be in the presence of the Japanese leader.

20111031-Kan Kantei china korea 22jck8_1.jpg
Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan with China's Wen Jiabao and the leader of South Korea

Fallout of the Island Dispute in 2010

Many analysts felt that Japan emerged from the island dispute looking weak and at the mercy of economic pressure applied by China. Others felt that although China might have scored points among nationalists and demonstrated its strength it damaged its international reputation by coming across as bully quick to resort to extreme measures and use any means possible to get its way.

The incident certainly raised fears and suspicions among Japanese. A record 84 percent of respondents in a Yomiuri Shimbun survey said they did not trust China, 89 percent said China’s perceived retaliation was excessive and 94 percent said that China’s demand for an apology was unacceptable. Kan’s handling of crisis resulted in a drop of his approval rating from 66 percent to 53 percent. The number of Chinese tourists visiting Japan and the number of Japanese tourists visiting China fell.

The whole incident raised worries about how potentially volatile relations are between China and Japan and how poor communication is between the two countries, how small players like boat captains and nationalist can shape events and how few checks there are preventing things from getting out of control. It also stressed the importance of Japan joining forces with the United States., South Korea and the ASEAN nations of Southeast Asia to from a united front to address China’s truculence.

For a while people were raising the question of whether Japan would reorient its policy away from the United States toward China but that changed after the island dispute. Japan’s Vice Foreign Minister Mitoji Yabunaka told the Yomiuri Shimbun: “These days people are living in a very visual society, and having seen the videos of a Chinese ship attacking Japan Coast Guard ships, and the very---how should I say---unusual actions taken by the Chinese government, including stopping exports of rare earths or [taking Japanese citizens into] custody. That sort of behavior really has hurt Japanese feelings toward China...That trend must be improved because, after all, China is a very, very important neighbor. But at the same time, that was a wake-up call, that we shouldn't count too much, unilaterally, on one country in economic matters.”

“China has misplayed its hand...and that has forced the Democratic Party to get more realistic about regional security issues,” Akihisa Nagashima, a Democratic lawmaker who until recently held the No. 3 spot at the Ministry of Defense, told the New York Times. “We don’t want overdependence on the United States, but we also need the United States.”

Paul Krugman wrote in New York Times, “China’s response to the trawler incident is, I’m sorry to say, further evidence that the world’s newest economic superpower isn’t prepared to assume the responsibilities that go with that status....Major economic powers, realizing that they have an important stake in the international system, are normally very hesitant about resorting to economic warfare, even in the face of severe provocation---witness the way U.S. policy makers have agonized and temporized over what to do about China’s grossly protectionist exchange-rate policy. China, however, showed no hesitation at all about using its trade muscle to get its way in a political dispute, in clear---if denied---violation of international trade law. Couple the rare earth story with China’s behavior on other fronts---the state subsidies that help firms gain key contracts, the pressure on foreign companies to move production to China and, above all, that exchange-rate policy---and what you have is a portrait of a rogue economic superpower, unwilling to play by the rules. And the question is what the rest of us are going to do about it. [Source: Paul Krugman New York Times, October 17, 2010]

Video of the Ship Collision

In November 2010, video footage of the collision was leaked on the Internet by a 44-year-old Kobe Coast Guard officer. He posted the video on YouTube after footage sent to CNN was not broadcast. The leaker, Masaharu Issiki, who had access to the video through his job, said, “I wanted as many people as possible to see the truth...I believed [posting the footage] would really benefit the country and the public. I thought about what is more important and decided to act.” Issiki resigned from his post after the incident. In January 2011, criminal charges against Issiki were dropped.

The video backed up reports made earlier. It was somewhat of an embarrassment to the government that video was leaked but on other hand it backed up assertion that the Chinese trawler was the aggressor. Some Chinese that saw the video said that it clearly showed the Japanese were the aggressor and that the big Japanese coast guard vessel bullied the smaller Chinese ship.

The 44-minute video shows the blue Chinese trawler pulling in its nets and then gunning it engines, with thick black smoke pouring from its smokestacks, and making a beeline for the Yonakuni, a Japanese Coast Guard patrol vessel, and ramming into the rear port side of the Yonakuni at nearly a right angle, causing a large noise. A voice is head saying, “it collided with us!” Another segment shows the Chinese vessel racing along the starboard side of a second Japanese vessel, the Miyuki, and ramming it on its rear starboard side, producing black smoke from a fire. Before the collision you can hear a voice saying in Japanese, “It’s coming at us.”

China and Japan Relations After the Island Dispute in 2010

After the island dispute Chinese boats were periodically spotted in the area of the disputed islands. In November 2010 a Chinese surveillance-patrol vessel equipped with helicopters took up position around the Senkaku Islands. In March 2011, Japanese Air Self-Defense Force jets were scrambled after two Chinese navy planes approached within 50 kilometers of the Senkaku Islands.

In December 2010, two fishermen were killed and three were detained after a 63-ton Chinese trawler capsized and sank after ramming a 3000-ton South Korean Coast Guard patrol vessel. The trawler was illegally fishing in South Korea’s Exclusive Economic Zone. The three fishermen attacked the South Korea coast guard officers with iron pipes and shovel but were ultimately freed after protest from the Chinese government.

In December 2011, Japan attended ceremony for the Nobel Peace Prize presentation to Liu Xiobo while many other countries bowed to Beijing pressure and didn’t attend. In January 2011, Japanese prosecutors decided to drop their cases against the Coast Guard officer who leaked the video of boat collision and the Chinese captain of the trawler.

in March 2011, a Chinese oil company official said China would unilaterally develop the Chuxiao (Shirakaba) natural gas field. In April 2011, the Japan Coast Guard seized a Chinese fishing trawler off Kagoshima. It happened about a month of the tsunami disaster in Japan and not a big issue was made of it.

In June 2011, a Chinese ocean research ship sampled waters in Japan’s exclusive economic zone off northern Honshu without prior notice and 11 Chinese Navy warships passed between Okinawa and Miyakojima of Okinawa Prefecture and conduct exercises in the Pacific and returned back to China between the same islands.

20111031-Kan Kantei china korea 21jck4.jpg
Jiabao and Kan at a disaster shelter

Relations Between China and Japan Improve After the Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan

After the earthquake and tsunami in March 2011, relations between China and Japan improved. Premier Wen Jiabao said China stands willing to give earthquake-struck Japan more help and expressed sympathy to what Japan had experienced. "I want to use today's opportunity to extend our deep condolences for the loss of lives in this disaster and to express our sincere sympathy to the Japanese people," Wen said at the end of his annual news conference in Beijing. [Source: Jason Lee, Reuters, March 14, 2011]

China sent earthquake rescuers and extended its “deep sympathy and solicitudes to the Japanese government and people.” The message was the friendliest exchanges out of Beijing towards Japan in months and an encouraging sign that relations between the two nation were on the mend after reaching a low poin six months earlier after a Chinese fishing boat collided with Japanese Coast Guard vessels near a group of disputed islands in the East China Sea.

"When the massive Wenchuan earthquake hit the Japanese government sent a rescue team to China and also offered supplies," said Wen, referring to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake that killed more than 80,000 people. "The Chinese rescue team arrived in Japan yesterday and we have provided relief supplies to Japan. We will continue to provide further necessary aid to Japan in accordance with their needs." [Ibid]

The government has also donated 30 million yuan ($4.56 million) of relief supplies to Japan that included quilts and tents, and dispatched a 15-member rescue team that headed immediately to the main quake zone upon landing in Tokyo on a chartered flight to help search for survivors, according to official news agency Xinhua.. Chinese President Hu Jintao sent a message to Japanese Emperor Akihito on Monday expressing sympathy for the victims of the disaster and the Chinese government's willingness to provide all "necessary assistance."

Reuters reported: “China's state-run television news has given over hours of live coverage to the disaster, largely displacing its dry reports on a meeting of China's rubber stamp parliament. While some nationalists have voiced satisfaction online at the sight of China's neighbor stricken by catastrophe, grief and sympathy have been much more common reactions, sometimes mixed with a political message. "I hope the Japanese persevere. We sympathize with the scale of the disaster they are facing," wrote one reader on the website of the Global Times, a normally stridently nationalist tabloid.

Many Chinese were concerned about radiation from Japan blowing towards China. There were also worries about food imports from Japan being contaminated with radiation. For a while there panic buying of Japanese salt both as a measure to stave off thyroid radiation poisoning and because many Chinese like Japanese salt and were worried about shortages.

20111031-Kan Kantei china korea 21jck1.jpg
leaders of Japan, China and South Korea eat cherries to show they are safe

Chinese Concern Over Radiation from Japan and a Run on Japanese Salt

Sharon Lafraniere wrote in the New York Times that a week or so after the earthquake and tsunami in 2011 and Fukushima nuclear power plant in China urged Japan to report any developments in its nuclear crisis quickly and accurately as “Chinese across the country emptied supermarkets of iodized salt even though government health officials warned that ingesting it would not protect against radiation exposure.” [Source: Sharon Lafraniere, New York Times, March 17, 2011]

“The China Meteorological Administration reported that the wind was sweeping radioactive pollutants from Japan’s crippled nuclear plant toward the southeast. China should not be affected... Nonetheless, panicked residents combed pharmacies in a mostly vain search for potassium iodine tablets. The tablets are believed to decrease the risk of developing thyroid cancer from nuclear radiation, but few Chinese pharmacies carry them, although health officials said the government had a stockpile for emergency distribution. A clerk at one downtown Beijing pharmacy said more than 20 people had asked for the tablets in the past two days.” [Ibid]

“Others residents flooded supermarkets looking for iodized salt after numerous postings on popular Internet chat sites that it can also protect people from radiation-related diseases. In an interview Tuesday night, Zhang Wei, quality management director at the Ministry of Health’s National Institute for Radiological Protection, said the level of iodine in salt was far too low to provide any protection. “Eating iodized salt will do nothing to protect a person from nuclear radiation,” he said. “Even eating two kilos of salt won’t help. More likely, it could kill a person.” [Ibid]

“Nonetheless, in downtown Beijing, Huapu Hypermarket sold out of salt Thursday morning. Clerks stocked five shelves with bags of rice instead. In a 10-minute period during the midafternoon, seven customers arrived asking for salt, including the 45-year-old mother of a toddler who said she had learned of its health benefits against radiation from QQ, one of China’s most popular Internet chat sites.

“In Jiangsu province north of Shanghai, Zhu Bei, a 25-year-old teacher, said people had lined up outside her local supermarket and had cleared the shelves of salt by 10 a.m.---before her mother sent her there to buy some. Her mother tried several other markets but came up empty-handed. She said she tried to reassure her mother that the salt would do no good anyway. ‘save the lecture,” her mother replied irritably. “You can’t even get us some salt.” [Ibid]

“China’s National Salt Industry Corporation, a state-owned company and China’s biggest salt producer, asked its subsidiaries to ramp up distribution of salt to places where panic buying had occurred, a spokesman said. He said the company’s Web site had so many hits Thursday it was disabled. [Ibid]

More Trouble in the Senkakus

In late August 2011, two Chinese fishing patrol vessels briefly entered Japanese territorial waters near the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, according to the Japan Coast Guard. The JCG said it was the seventh time this year that Chinese vessels approached the islands, but the first time that they entered Japanese territorial waters.The last intrusion by Chinese government ships was on Dec. 8, 2008, by two Chinese maritime research vessels. [Source: Yomiuri Shimbun, August 25, 2011]

According to the JCG, one of its patrol boats spotted the two vessels--the Yuzheng 201 and the Yuzheng 31001--sailing about 30 kilometers north-northeast of Kubajima island at about 6:15 a.m. The Yuzheng 201 entered Japanese territorial waters at 6:36 a.m. and the Yuzheng 31001 at 6:44 a.m. The vessels left the waters at about 7:15, but about 20 minutes later the Yuzheng 201 reentered the territorial waters for seven minutes.

Administrative Vice Foreign Minister Kenichiro Sasae summoned Chinese Ambassador to Japan Cheng Yonghua to the Foreign Ministry on Wednesday morning to protest the intrusion. Sasae told Cheng, "It cannot be regarded as innocent passage permitted under international laws," and demanded Beijing take measures to prevent a recurrence. However, the Chinese ambassador reiterated Beijing's claim that the Senkaku Islands are part of China's territory.

Analysts said Beijing again timed its aggressive action on Senkakus to coincide with power vacuum in Tokyo: this time as Prime Minister Naoto Kan was preparing to step down and the ruling Democratic Party of Japan occupied with preparations for selecting a new leader. China apparently believed the intrusion might not meet a strong political response from Tokyo.

In late September 2011, a a Chinese marine research vessel was spotted in Japan’s 200 nautical-mile economic exclusion zone (EEZ) off Kumejia Island, about 100 kilometers west of the main island of Okinawa.

Japan and China Concur on North Korea and Close 2011 on Relatively Good Terms

In late December 2011, Kyodo reported: “Japan and China concurred that peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula are of "common interest" to the two nations, and agreed on close cooperation to tackle issues following the death of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il. Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda and Chinese President Hu Jintao also agreed that Tokyo and Beijing will deepen their mutually beneficial strategic relationship ahead of the 40th anniversary of the normalization of diplomatic relations next year. [Source: Kyodo, December 26, 2011]

Hu expressed his willingness to resume the stalled six-party talks on Pyongyang's denuclearization, saying China will work to secure long-term stability on the Korean Peninsula, according to Japanese government officials. "Strengthening relations between the two countries is indispensable for solving regional and global issues," Noda, who was making his first official trip to Beijing since taking office in September, told Hu at the outset of their meeting. [Ibid]

Noda called on Hu to play an important role in helping resume the six-party talks, while seeking China's cooperation in resolving the issue of past abductions of Japanese citizens by North Korea, the government officials said. Hu was quoted by the officials as telling Noda that maintaining stability and peace on the Korean Peninsula is "a broad expectation" not only for regional nations but for the global community. "The role of China, the chair of the six-party talks, is very important," the Japanese officials quoted Noda as saying during the meeting, adding Japan's premier called China a country that "has an influence on North Korea.” [Ibid]

The summit meeting between Noda and Hu was held a week after the sudden news of Kim's death sparked concerns about regional security. Noda met Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao. Noda's visit to Beijing came as bilateral relations remain far from friendly due in part to a spat over maritime collisions last year near the disputed Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea. To ease the tensions over maritime security, Noda and the Chinese leaders have agreed to try to make the East China Sea "a sea of peace, cooperation and friendship," the Japanese officials said. They thus reached an agreement to create a new mechanism to discuss maritime security. [Ibid]

Noda called for the early resumption of bilateral talks on signing a treaty on a joint gas development project in the East China Sea, the officials said. The leaders also exchanged views on China's restrictions on Japanese food imports, which were imposed amid the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant crisis triggered by the devastating March 11 earthquake and tsunami, as well as a trilateral free trade agreement with South Korea, they said. Noda, meanwhile, asked Chinese leaders to visit Japan next year, the officials added. [Ibid]

In early December 2011, Kyodo reported, a Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force destroyer called at a port in Qingdao in China's Shandong Province for friendly exchanges, in the first such visit to the neighboring country since 2008. A Japanese destroyer visited a port in Zhanjiang in China's Guangdong Province in June 2008 in the first ever visit of its kind.[Source: Kyodo, December 19, 2011]

After the first port call, visits by MSDF vessels to China were called off for two consecutive years due to a visit to Japan by an exiled Uyghur ethnic minority leader in July 2009 and collisions involving a Chinese fishing boat and Japanese patrol boats off the disputed Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea in September last year. [Ibid]

A Chinese naval vessel visited ports in Tokyo in November 2007 and Hiroshima Prefecture in November 2009. Mutual port calls were agreed upon by the two countries' defense ministers in August 2007. [Ibid]

Image Sources:

Text Sources: New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Times of London, Yomiuri Shimbun, Daily Yomiuri, Japan Times, Mainichi Shimbun, The Guardian, National Geographic, The New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, Reuters, AP, Lonely Planet Guides, Compton’s Encyclopedia and various books and other publications.

Page Top

© 2008 Jeffrey Hays

Last updated October 2011

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of country or topic discussed in the article. This constitutes 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you are the copyright owner and would like this content removed from factsanddetails.com, please contact me.